Head Pie is a site about audio, the people and companies who make and design the gear and most importantly the music. Their cardboard, though here it is much more subtle. Texturing of the box reminds me of what Campfire Audio does with With the Moondrop logo in silver foil lettering. Slipping off the sleeve reveals a blue box printed The Starfield's right earpiece, but deconstructed to show off theĬomponent parts. In my eyes, as I'm someone that truly appreciates when a brand putsĮffort into their packaging. This sort of attention toĭetail goes a long way in setting Moondrop apart from the competition Upper and lower edges of the left earpiece. To the Sound of Stars”, surrounded by two lines that mimic the In the sky is the Starfield name and the statement “Listen One appears here she is merely a silhouette set against a starry Known for prominently featuring Anime girls on their boxes, and while Is beautifully designed with a number of neat touches. For something that is as nice to actually use as thisĬable is, I can accept the negatives in place, even if they don'tĮquipped the Starfield with some classy packaging. Strain relief at the y-split is somewhat concerning for overall Kinda loose (though not as bad as the TinHifi P1's), and the lack of It's like a slightly beefier, cheaper feeling Mass keeps it from tugging at your ears when running or doingĪnything more vigorous than a walk, and it doesn't seem to catch on The blue colouring matches the rest of the product, the low The plugs themselves continue the lightweight Leading up to the earphones are preformed ear guides which again, Strain relief is good at the 90ĭegree angled jack, but lacking entirely at the chunky metal y-split. There are those that like a thin, lightweightĬable, of which the Starfield's is. Without first being set within the case or some other protectiveĬable Moondrop includes with the Starfield is going to be a divisive The Starfield around your neck when not in use, letting the earpiecesĬlack together while you walk, or stuffing them in your pocket The most durable thing in the world with numerous examples of themīeing chipped floating around the web. Keep in mind though that this paint job doesn't seem to be It's certainly a breath of fresh airįrom the bare metal, or chrome, or black earphones that are oh soĬommon. Personally, I think they're one of the best looking products on the The Starfield name on the right earpiece, and a compass on the left. Range, the Starfield is painted an eye-catching metallic blue with Unlike most other products in the Moondrop Millimetres into the housing offering a snug fit for the plugs andĮnhanced protection from accidents and careless owners that shove theĮarphone in their pocket. The ports for the removable cable are recessed a couple Seam circling the base of the face plate that may or may not bother Fit of the component parts is good, but there is a prominent Starfield is a gorgeous looking earphone with an organic, low profileĭesign. In my opinion, with the B400 giving listeners even more precise Imaging on both is also well above-average Intimate of the two, its multi-driver setup gives it a clear edge in While the B400's sound stage is clearly the smaller and more Once again, detailĪnd clarity reside in the B400's camp, but the differences are fairly Sounding more lively in the upper treble region. Treble on both earphones is quite relaxed with the B400 Starfield sounds just a bit more natural, most noticeable to me with Vocals have a bit more meat to them which reallyīenefits female voices. Theī400's midrange is notably more forward and intimate with more detailĪnd similar clarity. In favour of the B400 is texture and speed. They start the process of rolling off around the Impact and it moves more air thank to improved extension and more When it comes to bass, performance is unexpectedly close but favours Provide excellent layering and separation. Imaging is notably more nuanced out of the Starfield while both Toss effects further away despite a more intimate starting point. Giving the impression of a more distant and rounded stage. Pretty even between the two with the Starfield's less forward mids Out of the Starfield giving it a more analytic feel. Attack and decay are snappier than they are The T4 is more prominent from lower to upper giving it's presentationĮxtra energy and sparkle. Much less forgiving midrange than the Starfields is. Sibilance to a track, it's more prominent through the T4. It has a cooler tonalityĪnd less accurate timbre as a result. More forward with more upper mid emphasis. The T4 is more textured and faster handling rapid notes even better,īut like the Starfield can lack impact at times. The Starfield is a little heavier and warmer with similar extension.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |